Our editorial formats and principles are primarily defined on teh foundations of facts, transparency and trustworthiness.

This is the distinct product is narrative intelligence for ordinary readers. Our News Briefing occupies a different space tracking a subject over weeks instead of abandoning it after the news cycle.

We produces country-specific editions and provide local context. We are not limited to left-versus-right. We are not merely an automated headline comparison. The service Includes YouTube, TikTok, podcasts and “newsfluencer” narratives. Providing editorial analysis of which claims have evidence behind them. And compares domestic coverage with how other countries see the story, how does West German publications present the Ukraine war?

1. The News Briefing

The main format for an important breaking or developing story:

  1. What happened
  2. The five essential facts
  3. Why it matters
  4. What remains uncertain
  5. What established news outlets are saying
  6. What creators and independent commentators are saying
  7. Where the narratives agree
  8. Where they conflict
  9. What the available evidence supports
  10. What to watch next

Conversation Briefing

For subjects dominating public discussion:

“Why is everyone talking about this?”

This should analyse search trends, videos, headlines, statements and the questions audiences are asking—not simply repeat the breaking news.

3. Newsrooms vs Creators

A signature format comparing:

  • Newspaper and broadcaster framing
  • Independent journalist coverage
  • YouTube and podcast commentary
  • Viral claims
  • Missing context
  • Supported versus unsupported claims

Every video reference should include a direct link and timestamp.

4. Compare & Contrast

A structured side-by-side treatment irrespective of the branded website – a fair start:

  • What the BBC says
  • What right-leaning media says
  • What left-leaning media says
  • What specialists say
  • What creators say
  • What everyone agrees on
  • The unresolved disagreement

This is to ensure we do not create false equivalence. A popular claim is not automatically as credible as a documented claim.

Scroll to Top