Keir Starmer, in response to Conservative warnings about the dangers of a Labour “supermajority”, has emphasized that a big Labour majority would be beneficial for Britain. He believes that growing the economy and wealth creation are crucial, and that without a strong economy, it is difficult to improve public services. Starmer argues that a strong mandate is necessary for implementing challenging changes, and that a big majority would be better for the country as it would allow them to make the necessary changes and move the country forward.
General election live: big Labour majority would be better for the country, says Starmer | General election 2024
Starmer says big Labour majority ‘better for the country’
Andrew Sparrow
Good morning. I’m Andrew Sparrow, taking over from Helen Sullivan.
As reported earlier, while the Conservatives are trying to depress the Labour vote by warning about the dangers of a Labour “supermajority”, Keir Starmer has said a big Labour majority would be good for Britain.
Here is the full extract from the Times interview where he made that point. Steven Swinford reports:
For all his instinctive caution, Starmer makes a virtue of the Tory attack by appealing to voters to hand the party a “strong mandate”.
“The most important thing is growing the economy and wealth creation,” he says. “I do think that’s been the Achilles’ heel for 13 years now.
“You can talk about public services but if you haven’t got your economy working then you can’t do that. If you haven’t settled the planning, the infrastructure challenges, then you can’t get your economy going.
“It’s the mindset change we’ve talked about. Do we need a strong mandate for that? Yes, we do. Because these changes are difficult and the sense of the whole country wanting those changes is important in terms of the platform on which we stand to take the country forward.”
The bigger the majority, the better? “Better for the country. Because it means we can roll up our sleeves and get on with the change we need.”
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line (BTL) or message me on X (Twitter). I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use X; I’ll see something addressed to @AndrewSparrow very quickly. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos (no error is too small to correct). And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
Share
Key events
Sunak is doing the interview from a supermarket. Thompson asks him if he knows the prices of a loaf of bread. Sunak says at Morrisons a tiger bloomer loaf is £1.35.
Thompson asks if he knows how much it has gone up in price over the last five years.
Sunak says he does not have that figure to hand. Thompson tells him it is 28%.
And that’s the end of the interview.
(It was not a phone-in, as I said earlier. Sorry; I was misinformed.)
Share
Asked about the best moments in the job, Sunak says it has been meeting people who have come through some tragedy but than campaigned for change.
Asked about the worst moments, he says it is a difficult job, and sometimes you do not achieve what you want. He says he would like to make more progress on waiting lists.
Share
Ben Thomspon says Sunak laid out five priorities, but has only met one of them.
Sunak says he is glad Thompson made that point. He claims Keir Starmer has not got give priorities.
On inflation, he says he has met that. It is more than halved.
On economic growth, he says in the first quarter of this year “our economy grew faster than every other major economy including France, Germany, Italy and America”.
Thomspon says, if you take other timeframes, the record is less impressive.
Sunak says the government is complying with debt rules.
Sunak says he has not made as much progress as he wants on waiting lists.
And, on small boats, he says Starmer would abandon the Rwanda plan.
(In fact, Starmer has set out his priorities. He has said he will be guided by five missions, and he has set out six first steps for government.)
Share
Prof John Curtice says ‘more chance of lightning striking twice, in same place’, than of Sunak winning election
Sally Nugent says the BBC asked Prof Sir John Curtice, the polling expert, about the chances of the Tories winning. He said there was “more chance of lightning striking twice, in the same place, and a bit more” than of Rishi Sunak remaining PM. Do you agree?
Sunak says that is Curtice’s view. He says he is working as hard as he can to win people over.
Share
Updated at 08.42 BST
Sunak says Labour would be ‘unaccountable’ with big majority – but ducks question about whether big Tory majorities also bad
Ben Thompson and Sally Nugent are presenting on BBC Breakfast. They are interviewing Rishi Sunak now.
Q: Why have you stopped talking about what a Tory government would do, and started talking about the dangers of Labour?
Sunak claims he is still talking about what he would do. But with a big majority Labour would be “unchecked and unaccountable”.
Q: When Margaret Thatcher and Boris Johnson won big majorities, was that dangerous for the country?
Sunak ignores the question, and says Labour would put up taxes, and make the UK the “soft touch of Europe” for migration.
Share
Updated at 08.35 BST
Rishi Sunak is about to do a phone-in on BBC Breakfast.
Share
Starmer says big Labour majority ‘better for the country’
Andrew Sparrow
Good morning. I’m Andrew Sparrow, taking over from Helen Sullivan.
As reported earlier, while the Conservatives are trying to depress the Labour vote by warning about the dangers of a Labour “supermajority”, Keir Starmer has said a big Labour majority would be good for Britain.
Here is the full extract from the Times interview where he made that point. Steven Swinford reports:
For all his instinctive caution, Starmer makes a virtue of the Tory attack by appealing to voters to hand the party a “strong mandate”.
“The most important thing is growing the economy and wealth creation,” he says. “I do think that’s been the Achilles’ heel for 13 years now.
“You can talk about public services but if you haven’t got your economy working then you can’t do that. If you haven’t settled the planning, the infrastructure challenges, then you can’t get your economy going.
“It’s the mindset change we’ve talked about. Do we need a strong mandate for that? Yes, we do. Because these changes are difficult and the sense of the whole country wanting those changes is important in terms of the platform on which we stand to take the country forward.”
The bigger the majority, the better? “Better for the country. Because it means we can roll up our sleeves and get on with the change we need.”
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line (BTL) or message me on X (Twitter). I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use X; I’ll see something addressed to @AndrewSparrow very quickly. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos (no error is too small to correct). And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
Share
Energy Secretary Claire Coutinho has echoed Rishi Sunak’s claim that just 130,000 voters could prevent a Labour landslide.
She told LBC Radio:
It’s never over ‘till it’s over. What I would say is that lots of people, if they look at the press, they might think the election is a foregone conclusion.
Actually, it’s a relatively small amount of voters across the country – about 130,000 people have been estimated – who can make the difference in this election.
Asked by presenter Nick Ferrari whether those voters could bring about a Tory victory, she said: “There’s quite a lot of seats that are very, very marginal, Nick. So, actually, just a handful of voters in those seats can change the outcome in those seats.”
With that, and with Lenny Kravitz now in my head, this is Helen Sullivan leaving you in the capable hands of Andrew Sparrow.
Share
Updated at 08.18 BST
Stephen Flynn also said voters in Scotland will need to choose whether they want members of parliament who will “go and sit quietly behind Keir Starmer and nod along”, or those who will stand up to him.
Stephen Flynn, the SNP’s Westminster leader. Photograph: Ken McKay/ITV/REX/Shutterstock
Speaking on BBC Breakfast, SNP’s Westminster leader said:
Do they want members of parliament who will sit opposite Keir Starmer, will stand up to him on the biggest issues, who will argue against austerity, argue for better relations with the European Union, argue for investment in our NHS, action on the cost-of-living crisis, for Scotland’s right to choose and recognition of the state of Palestine?
If they believe in that, then vote for the SNP, and that over the course of the next 48 hours I believe will come through to the general public and ensure that right across Scotland we can win the seats where it’s a very close battle between ourselves and the Labour Party.”
Share
Meanwhile the SNP’s Westminster leader Stephen Flynn has just been on BBC Breakfast, where he said he was “massively concerned” voters across Scotland reporting they have not received their postal votes.
He told BBC Breakfast:
I’m massively concerned about that, like almost every candidate across Scotland that I believe to be the case. I’ve had numerous emails from people who have not received their postal ballot, that’s simply not good enough.
You know, we warned the Prime Minister of this when it became apparent that he was going to choose the election date because, of course, for a huge majority of the people of Scotland, it’s now the school holidays, people are away on holiday.
If their postal vote didn’t land in time, then they’re now disenfranchised from this election, they’re not able to vote for who they want to represent them at Westminster, whether that’s the SNP, or otherwise, that’s simply not good enough.
I see some individuals are blaming the Royal Mail but the reality is the system is not fit for purpose, and we need to see huge reform. We also need to see a big reflection on how we’ve managed to get into a situation where a prime minister can at his own whim declare an election, the Tories decided this was the way that they want the elections to operate in the UK.”
Share
Postal affairs minister ‘urgently’ investigating ballot delays
The postal affairs minister is “urgently” investigating delays to postal ballots being delivered, Health Minister Maria Caulfield has said.
Postal affairs minister Kevin Hollinrake has criticised Royal Mail for failing to deliver votes in time for the General Election.
Caulfield told Sky News:
Kevin is taking this very seriously. He’s in direct contact with the Royal Mail.
It doesn’t seem to be an issue in my constituency, but I know a number of colleagues where people haven’t received their postal votes and are worried about that.
Kevin is investigating this urgently. I know there’s extra resources going into this to try and do a sweep of all the sorting offices and make sure they’re out there.
If people have only just received their postal vote, they can take it to their polling station on election day and it will still be counted.”
Share
Read the full story on www.theguardian.com
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/live/2024/jul/02/uk-general-election-2024-tories-labour-polls